Has the quality of conversations at cafes gotten better? I almost never eavesdrop as I tend to be locked in to the screen of my laptop, but at least twice in the last two days I’ve overheard really interesting tech conversations, by people who actually understand what they’re talking about.

When the snow melts and then freezes it turns to ice. Hard slippery ice that coats all the open areas, turning the city into a kingdom of ice.

Snowy, bright and cold this final day of 2013. I wish all my tumblr friends a great 2014, full of luck and health and goodness! Cheers!

According to this graffiti, you miss 100 percent of the shots you don’t take.

If Hall has a completion percentage of 75 + n – n^2 or zero, whichever is greater, and Oates has a completion percentage of 4*n, where n represents the n’th shot taken by that player, and a total of 25 shots will be taken, when should Hall stop shooting and pass the damn ball?

All mediums of creative expression follow the same kind of cycles, broadly speaking. Pioneers explore some aspect of the medium, laying down the initial rules and setting the early templates. This is followed by a round of improvements and tweaks, where rules are adjusted and extended. Competition drives up quality, richness and complexity explode. Talented individuals and groups dominate their medium and begin to explore it’s edges, pushing boundaries and challenging audiences. Before long, burn out and fatigue sets in, especially among the creators. The conversation turns inward, as do the jokes and references. Complexity reaches a breaking point, where appreciating the latest artistic expressions requires years of study.

Sometimes the medium ossifies (as in The Opera). Other times the creators – now bored, restless, worn out or lazy – blow up the medium, overthrowing old rules and patterns. Quality gives way to novelty, constructing rich artworks is replaced with a rush to deconstruct previous assumptions. Counter-reactionary elements try to hold the core, but their efforts, however popular, seem trite, insipid, the application of talent to cynical exploitations of nostalgia (see Kinkade, or trace the whole story from early Beatles to late Beatles to Yoko Ono to Wings).

Eventually, a new round of innovation begins, sometimes in the guise of a return to past ideas of quality, now updated to include the latest technologies and techniques. Other times innovation emerges as meticulous attention to detail fuses with unlimited imagination, accepted patterns expand to subsume populist elements in ironic or post-ironic fashion (see Mark Ryden and the Lowbrow art movement – or an old article I wrote about post-irony).

Architecture, especially big expensive public architecture, has the least room to hide, and is the most susceptible to rot as familiarity and iconic status elevate dreck and schlock into warm fuzzy feelings through the magic of nostalgia (as in the CN Tower, or local landmark Honest Ed’s). This drives architects to experiment with novel forms on the assumption that distinctive designs will come to be accepted over time, independent of quality and foresight (see my recent post about the Royal Ontario Museum). Other times, these forms become instant classics, fusing great design with extraordinary presence, redefining the rules at a higher level of innovation, as is the case with Ai Weiwei’s ‘Bird’s Nest’ stadium, or Frank Gehry’s masterful addition to the Art Gallery of Ontario, show in the photo above.